Fedora Fonts
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: font packages list
- DroidSans aliasing
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- From: pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Re: Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Update on forcing autohinting per font
- Re: [Announce] Released 1.07.0 version of Liberation fonts
- From: pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Announce] Released 1.07.0 version of Liberation fonts
- [Announce] Released 1.07.0 version of Liberation fonts
- Re: fc-cache not adding fonts to system.
- fc-cache not adding fonts to system.
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- From: pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- Re: Please add Nanum fonts for Korean Users.
- Re: Partially hinted fonts
- From: pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
- Partially hinted fonts
- missing the fonts of CID Speedo etc.
- Re: Please add Nanum fonts for Korean Users.
- Please add Nanum fonts for Korean Users.
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- Re: fontforge in f15
- fontforge in f15
- Re: Fixing glob2
- Re: Fixing glob2
- Re: Fixing glob2
- Re: Fixing glob2
- Fixing glob2
- Re: Which fonts should be pulled in by desktop environments as dependencies?!
- Re: Which fonts should be pulled in by desktop environments as dependencies?!
- Re: Which fonts should be pulled in by desktop environments as dependencies?!
- Which fonts should be pulled in by desktop environments as dependencies?!
- Re: HVD Comic Serif Pro: licensing confusion
- Re: HVD Comic Serif Pro: licensing confusion
- Re: font packages list
- audit fontconfig files
- Re: font packages list
- Rail Model font for coders
- From: hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
- Re: font packages list
- Re: font packages list
- Re: font packages list
- Re: font packages list
- 2.4.4 release of Lohit Devanagari
- From: pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
- Fwd: Re: License questions about HVD Comic Serif Pro Font
- Re: aajohan-comfortaa-fonts not in Fonts Group
- Re: HVD Comic Serif Pro: licensing confusion
- Re: font packages list
- Re: font packages list
- Re: font packages list
- font packages list
- Re: aajohan-comfortaa-fonts not in Fonts Group
- aajohan-comfortaa-fonts not in Fonts Group
- Re: [Fwd: Khmer Unicode not working on Fedora 14]
- [Fwd: Khmer Unicode not working on Fedora 14]
- HVD Comic Serif Pro: licensing confusion
- From: J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: texlive fonts
- texlive fonts
- kanotf-fonts looking for review.
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- [Fwd: Orphaning my packages]
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- [no subject]
- From: francis+fedora+fonts
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- From: francis+fedora+fonts
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- Re: Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- Unicode-friendly TTF fonts in Fedora and/or EPEL?
- Re: Gnu FreeFont package information
- Re: [Fwd: [DejaVu-fonts] Unicode Viewer released]
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Gnu FreeFont package information
- [Fwd: [DejaVu-fonts] Unicode Viewer released]
- can we use -ve RBearing for glyph
- From: pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: Linux and application installing
- Re: Linux and application installing
- Re: Linux and application installing
- Re: Linux and application installing
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: TeX-Gyre Fonts
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- TeX-Gyre Fonts
- Re: 30 New Free High-Quality Fonts
- Re: Fonts package Makefile?
- Re: 30 New Free High-Quality Fonts
- Re: 30 New Free High-Quality Fonts
- 30 New Free High-Quality Fonts
- Re: Fonts package Makefile?
- Re: Fonts package Makefile?
- Re: Fonts package Makefile?
- Fonts package Makefile?
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review
- Re: Disabled bytecode interpreter
- Re: Disabled bytecode interpreter
- Disabled bytecode interpreter
- New FLOSS Monotype font (CJK)
- Comfortaa fonts submitted for stable release
- Re: From VFB to UFO to TrueType?
- Re: From VFB to UFO to TrueType?
- Re: From VFB to UFO to TrueType?
- Re: Slightly OT - A Web Designer's Guide to Linux
- Re: W3C work
- Slightly OT - A Web Designer's Guide to Linux
- W3C work
- Re: GUST fonts
- Re: LG Oski * fonts
- Re: LG Oski * fonts
- Re: LG Oski * fonts
- re: GUST fonts
- re: GUST fonts
- re: GUST fonts
- Re: LG Oski * fonts
- Re: GUST fonts
- Re: Introduction, and ADF Gillius packaging
- Re: LG Oski * fonts
- LG Oski * fonts
- Re: Introduction, and ADF Gillius packaging
- GUST fonts
- Introduction and need of Comfortaa package review
- Introduction, and ADF Gillius packaging
- Google font api
- Re: Packaging page ... odd?
- Packaging page ... odd?
- Some feedback on STIX fonts
- New licence for STIX fonts: OFL (was STIX licence)
- Some feedback on your PT Sans fonts
- New licence for ParaType PT Sans: OFL (was PTFL)
- Some feedback on Yanone Kaffeesatz
- New licence for Yanone Kaffeesatz: OFL (was CC-BY)
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- What happens if a package includes non-free fonts already?
- Re: openfontlibrary is dead?
- Re: openfontlibrary is dead?
- Re: openfontlibrary is dead?
- Re: openfontlibrary is dead?
- openfontlibrary is dead?
- Re: Proggy Tiny Slashed Zero font
- Re: Proggy Tiny Slashed Zero font
- Proggy Tiny Slashed Zero font
- Re: From VFB to UFO to TrueType?
- Re: Is IM Fell free?
- From: J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: Is IM Fell free?
- From VFB to UFO to TrueType?
- Re: Not packaging Epigrafica
- Not packaging Epigrafica
- Re: Is IM Fell free?
- Re: Is IM Fell free?
- Re: Is IM Fell free?
- Is IM Fell free?
- From: J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: typesupply.com
- Re: Opening up of various fonts by google
- xgridfit updated to 2.2a in fedora-devel
- Re: typesupply.com
- Re: typesupply.com
- Re: Fonts for professional presentations
- Re: Fonts for professional presentations
- Fonts for professional presentations
- From: Raphael Pereira de Faria
- Re: Opening up of various fonts by google
- Re: typesupply.com
- typesupply.com
- Re: Opening up of various fonts by google
- Re: Opening up of various fonts by google
- Re: Opening up of various fonts by google
- Re: Opening up of various fonts by google
- Re: Opening up of various fonts by google
- Opening up of various fonts by google
- Released Samyak Fonts 1.2.2 Today
- Re: Help packaging font.
- trimming fonts from kde live
- Poor state of my font packages
- Subpackages for single variants of a family?
- compare="contains" issue
- Re: Please review another new proposal to improve Chinese fonts choosing in fontconfig.
- Re: Please review another new proposal to improve Chinese fonts choosing in fontconfig.
- Re: Font dependencies and graphical applications
- Re: Font dependencies and graphical applications
- Font dependencies and graphical applications
- Re: Please review another new proposal to improve Chinese fonts choosing in fontconfig.
- Please review another new proposal to improve Chinese fonts choosing in fontconfig.
- Re: Liberation font development
- From: Caius 'kaio' Chance
- Liberation font development
- bugfix and enhancement release of lohit-kannada 2.4.5 and lohit-punjabi 2.4.4
- Re: Help packaging font.
- Help packaging font.
- Re: SIG status?
- Re: SIG status?
- Re: The binding inheritance on fontconfig
- The binding inheritance on fontconfig
- warning while generating .ttf file
- Re: Funding for open/libre font creation
- Re: Funding for open/libre font creation
- Funding for open/libre font creation
- Re: Proposal for some changes for Chinese Fonts in Fedora 13.
- Re: Proposal for some changes for Chinese Fonts in Fedora 13.
- Proposal for some changes for Chinese Fonts in Fedora 13.
- Re: Weird behaviour: o is mis-rendered when a j is near
- Re: fontconfig priorities for non-LGC fonts
- Re: Weird behaviour: o is mis-rendered when a j is near
- Re: Epigrafica and Breip fonts are no longer in progress
- Epigrafica and Breip fonts are no longer in progress
- Re: fontconfig priorities for non-LGC fonts
- Re: fontconfig priorities for non-LGC fonts
- Re: fontconfig priorities for non-LGC fonts
- Re: fontconfig priorities for non-LGC fonts
- Re: fontconfig priorities for non-LGC fonts
- Re: fontconfig priorities for non-LGC fonts
- Weird behaviour: o is mis-rendered when a j is near
- fontconfig priorities for non-LGC fonts
- Re: Packaging Ubuntu title fonts
- Re: Packaging Ubuntu title fonts
- Packaging Ubuntu title fonts
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: Miso fonts - need some font expert help
- Re: Miso fonts - need some font expert help
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: Miso fonts - need some font expert help
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Miso fonts - need some font expert help
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: fontforge update for f12?
- Re: fontforge update for f12?
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- fontforge update for f12?
- Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Releasing Lohit Devanagari Today!!
- Re: Questions about packaging CYKLOP font
- Questions about packaging CYKLOP font
- Re: fontconfig config priority
- Re: fontconfig config priority
- fontconfig config priority
- Re: Preview font package contents without installing first?
- Re: woff and woffTools packages anyone want maintainership?
- Re: woff and woffTools packages anyone want maintainership?
- woff and woffTools packages anyone want maintainership?
- Preview font package contents without installing first?
- Re: FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide
- From: Caius 'kaio' Chance
- Re: FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide
- FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide
- Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
- Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 fedora-devel
- [RFA] Font package differences between Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 Fedora devel
- [RFA] Font test result differences between Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 devel
- [RFA] Font test result differences between Fedora 11 and Fedora 12
- [RFA] Font package differences between Fedora 11 and Fedora 12
- [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (real one, not devel)
- Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
- [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
- [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 fedora-devel
- Updated version of the Isabella font
- From: francis+fedora+fonts
- Re: tcpdf fonts
- Re: tcpdf fonts
- Re: Broken dependencies: wqy-zenhei-fonts
- Re: Broken dependencies: wqy-zenhei-fonts
- Fwd: Broken dependencies: wqy-zenhei-fonts
- tcpdf fonts
- Two new packaged fonts
- Re: M+ fonts
- Re: M+ fonts
- Re: M+ fonts
- Re: M+ fonts
- Re: M+ fonts
- Re: M+ fonts
- Re: M+ fonts
- Re: M+ fonts
- M+ fonts
- Re: Rpmlint does not like my license
- Re: Rpmlint does not like my license
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Rpmlint does not like my license
- New audit messages
- Re: "Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!"
- Re: "Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!"
- Re: "Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!"
- Re: "Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!"
- Re: "Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!"
- Re: "Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!"
- "Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!"
- Re: What would be considered a fault in font encodings?
- What would be considered a fault in font encodings?
- New fontpackages releases
- Web Open Font Format for Firefox 3.6
- Hello and Tiza Fonts packaged for review
- SIL Scheherazade font is now in Fedora
- Re: Font package review request for AnonymousPro
- Font package review request for AnonymousPro
- Re: fonts.dir and fonts.scale
- fonts.dir and fonts.scale
- Re: Coordinating Outreach to font authors
- Re: Packaging M+ & Widelands fonts from the wishlist
- Packaging M+ & Widelands fonts from the wishlist
- Re: Coordinating Outreach to font authors
- Re: Tiresias fonts question
- Coordinating Outreach to font authors
- Tiresias fonts question
- Re: New font package review request for Sheherazade SIL font
- Re: EPEL support
- EPEL support
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: New font package review request for Sheherazade SIL font
- Re: New font package review request for Sheherazade SIL font
- Re: Self-introduction, and review request
- New font package : oflb-prociono-fonts
- Re: bitmap-fonts by default?
- Self-introduction, and review request
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: bitmap-fonts by default?
- Re: bitmap-fonts by default?
- Re: bitmap-fonts by default?
- Re: bitmap-fonts by default?
- [Short] Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-09-29
- bitmap-fonts by default?
- New font package review request for Sheherazade SIL font
- Re: Heuristica metadata problem
- Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-09-26
- Adobe CMap and AGLFN data now free software!
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- Re: can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- 2.4.4 release of Malayalam, Telugu, Tamil and Kannada lohit font
- Re: restricted mailing list
- Re: restricted mailing list
- Re: can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- Re: can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- Re: can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- Re: can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- Re: can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- restricted mailing list
- can Libertine fonts be embedded in non-gpl application?
- Re: Apple's font hinting patents are going to expire ... freefont-freeworld to Fedora?
- Re: Apple's font hinting patents are going to expire ... freefont-freeworld to Fedora?
- Apple's font hinting patents are going to expire ... freefont-freeworld to Fedora?
- Heuristica metadata problem
- new release of lohit-fonts 2.4.3
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-09-06
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-09-06
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-09-06
- Re: About Farsiweb fonts
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: New font packaging request
- Re: About Farsiweb fonts
- Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-09-06
- Re: TeX Live fonts
- Re: TeX Live fonts
- New font packaging request
- About Farsiweb fonts
- vemana2000-fonts (Telugu font) now available in Fedora
- new release of lohit-fonts
- Re: Introduction
- Re:Introduction
- Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
- New packaging request
- Introduction
- Re: [Indlinux-group] Lohit fonts is now Unicode 5.1 compatible
- Lohit fonts is now Unicode 5.1 compatible
- Re: lyx-fonts , feedback please
- lyx-fonts , feedback please
- pothana2000-fonts (Telugu font) now available in Fedora
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20
- Re: ttf2eot needs to be packaged to allow Fedora to make cross-browser embedded-font websites
- ttf2eot needs to be packaged to allow Fedora to make cross-browser embedded-font websites
- Current state of text rendering
- [Fwd: Re: Is SIP DIPA license acceptable?]
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: LUG-boards: URW++ original 35 fonts available under LPPL
- Use of OTF extention for OpenDocument Formula Template
- Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
- Re: Terminal emulator supporting Indic scripts like {kn, hi, pa}_IN.utf-8
- Terminal emulator supporting Indic scripts like {kn, hi, pa}_IN.utf-8
- GFS Theokritos problem
- Senamirmir fonts problems
- [VERY LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report: Fedora 11 state
- Re: rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel .cvsignore,1.6,1.7
- Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Debtags localisation and font tags proposal
- Re: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Debtags localisation and font tags proposal
- IPA font
- Re: Priority list breaks the order of the font on non-native locale
- Re: Priority list breaks the order of the font on non-native locale
- Priority list breaks the order of the font on non-native locale
- Re: Changing « Preferred Family » value
- Re: Changing « Preferred Family » value
- From: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
- Re: Changing « Preferred Family » value
- Re: Changing « Preferred Family » value
- Re: Changing « Preferred Family » value
- Changing « Preferred Family » value
- From: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
- lohit-fonts-2.3.8 released
- Re: fontforge update for f10?
- Re: fontforge update for f10?
- Re: fontforge update for f10?
- fontforge update for f10?
- fontforge scripting change
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- From: Caius "kaio" Chance
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- From: Caius "kaio" Chance
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Fwd: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Fedora needs your help
- Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- another font packaged, awaiting reviews.
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Font previewer requirements
- Font previewer requirements
- Re: Help with licensing questions
- Help with licensing questions
- Re: help with source package font path
- Re: help with source package font path
- Re: help with source package font path
- From: Caius "kaio" Chance
- Re: help with source package font path
- Re: help with source package font path
- Re: help with source package font path
- From: Caius "kaio" Chance
- Re: Help request about hinting dev (Liberation Fonts).
- From: Caius "kaio" Chance
- help with source package font path
- Re: FLOSS Multimedia Support in Fedora
- Re: FLOSS Multimedia Support in Fedora
- Re: FLOSS Multimedia Support in Fedora
- Re: Help request about hinting dev (Liberation Fonts).
- Re: Help request about hinting dev (Liberation Fonts).
- Re: Help request about hinting dev (Liberation Fonts).
- Re: Help request about hinting dev (Liberation Fonts).
- Re: Help request about hinting dev (Liberation Fonts).
- Help request about hinting dev (Liberation Fonts).
- From: Caius "kaio" Chance
- Re: fontconfig questions
- Re: New fonts not on wishlist?
- Re: New fonts not on wishlist?
- Re: policy on shipping/using flags
- Re: fontconfig questions
- New fonts not on wishlist?
- Re: fontconfig questions
- fontconfig questions
- Re: BPG Georgian Unicode fonts - packagers wanted
- Re: BPG Georgian Unicode fonts - packagers wanted
- Re: [Fonts-list] Help with multi spec
- From: Caius "kaio" Chance
- New font package, needs a review/sponsor
- Re: [Fonts-list] Help with multi spec
- [Fonts-list] Help with multi spec
- Re: BPG Georgian Unicode fonts - packagers wanted
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- BPG Georgian Unicode fonts - packagers wanted
- Re: Finish Font Birth
- Re: Finish Font Birth
- Re: Finish Font Birth
- Finish Font Birth
- Thank you all for the packaging!
- Re: koji build results
- Re: koji build results
- Re: koji build results
- Re: Lost in translation, part II: Lost in orthographies
- Re: Lost in translation, part II: Lost in orthographies
- Re: Lost in translation, part II: Lost in orthographies
- Re: Lost in translation, part II: Lost in orthographies
- Lost in translation, part II: Lost in orthographies
- Re: Font CVS Requests
- Re: Font CVS Requests
- Font CVS Requests
- Re: Packaging questions
- Re: Packaging questions
- Re: Packaging questions
- Re: Packaging questions
- Re: Packaging questions
- Re: Lost in translation: font policy ambiguous regarding localization groups
- Re: Lost in translation: font policy ambiguous regarding localization groups
- Re: Packaging questions
- Re: Packaging questions
- Re: Lost in translation: font policy ambiguous regarding localization groups
- Re: Lost in translation: font policy ambiguous regarding localization groups
- Re: Lost in translation: font policy ambiguous regarding localization groups
- Re: Packaging questions
- Re: Packaging questions
- Lost in translation: font policy ambiguous regarding localization groups
- Re: Packaging questions
- Packaging questions
- [Fwd: Re: Needing advice on choosing a font]
- [Fwd: Re: Introduction]
- Fwd: Introduction
- From: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
- Re: Introduction
- Introduction
- Re: Needing
- Needing
- From: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Re: Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Re: Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Packging Fonts at FAD SCaLE was fedora-fonts-list
- Re: Fedora-fonts-list Digest, Vol 16, Issue 14
- Re: Fedora-fonts-list Digest, Vol 16, Issue 14
- Re: Fedora-fonts-list Digest, Vol 16, Issue 14
- Re: Fedora-fonts-list Digest, Vol 16, Issue 14
- Re: Fedora-fonts-list Digest, Vol 16, Issue 14
- [LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report
- Re: Claiming ownership of orphaned packages
- Re: Unikurdweb.conf
- Unikurdweb.conf
- Re: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12
- Re: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12
- [Fwd: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines]
- Renaming reviews
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] Draft vote on Font Package Naming
- [Fwd: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Draft vote on Font Package Naming]
- Re: TeX font package naming guidelines
- Re: TeX font package naming guidelines
- Re: New font packaging guidelines
- Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya font licensing
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] comic fonts :)
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] comic fonts :)
- Re: First font-package
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: fontpackages template warnings
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: fontpackages template warnings
- First font-package
- Re: fontpackages template warnings
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] comic fonts :)
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] comic fonts :)
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] comic fonts :)
- Re: fontpackages template warnings
- Re: fontpackages template warnings
- fontpackages template warnings
- Re: New font packaging guidelines
- Re: New font packaging guidelines
- Re: New font packaging guidelines
- Re: New font packaging guidelines
- Re: Help with new font packaging guidelines (choosing font family)
- Re: New font packaging guidelines
- Re: New font packaging guidelines
- Font package splitting clarification
- Font package naming guidelines
- Re: Help with new font packaging guidelines (choosing font family)
- Help with new font packaging guidelines (choosing font family)
- Font package splitting clarification
- Re: Orphaned font packages
- New font packaging guidelines
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
- Re: Classroom session on Fedora fonts packaging
- Re: Classroom session on Fedora fonts packaging
- Classroom session on Fedora fonts packaging
- Re: [Fwd: Droid fallback CJK and fontconfig?]
- Re: [Fwd: Droid fallback CJK and fontconfig?]
- Re: [Fwd: Droid fallback CJK and fontconfig?]
- Re: [Fwd: Droid fallback CJK and fontconfig?]
- Droid fallback CJK and fontconfig?
- Re: where's the wish list for F11?
- Re: where's the wish list for F11?
- From: Thomas M Steenholdt
- Re: where's the wish list for F11?
- Re: FWN article on web font surveys
- Re: FWN article on web font surveys
- Re: where's the wish list for F11?
- Re: where's the wish list for F11?
- Re: FWN article on web font surveys
- Re: FWN article on web font surveys
- FWN article on web font surveys
- Re: [Fontconfig] conf.avail, rpmlint and the FHS
- Re: [Fontconfig] conf.avail, rpmlint and the FHS
- New Fedora fonts packaging guidelines
- Re: conf.avail, rpmlint and the FHS
- Re: [LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report
- Re: [LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report
- Re: [LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report
- Re: [LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report
- Re: conf.avail, rpmlint and the FHS
- Desktop team brainstorming
- Re: Font Questions
- Font Questions
- New font-design group in Fedora 11
- Re: Fwd: Gnu FreeFont -- new release
- Re: Beteckna fonts - new wishlist font
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
- Re: [LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report
- Re: [LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report
- Re: Beteckna fonts - new wishlist font
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
- Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Users]
[Font Configuration]
[Red Hat Sound]
[Red Hat Development]
[Linux Kernel]