Re: Please review another new proposal to improve Chinese fonts choosing in fontconfig.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


>>>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:21:43 -0400 (EDT),
>>>>> "PW" == Peng Wu <pwu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

PW> This change is merged back into in 65-0-wqy-zenhei.conf.
PW> Please review this proposal, could we land this on Fedora 13?

You need to rename 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf to 65-0- or
something like that.

  <test qual="any" name="lang" compare="contains">

The default value for qual is "any". so you don't need to
describe it explicitly. also you shouldn't use
compare="contains". I'll post another mail for more details

  <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="strong">
    <string>Bitstream Vera Sans</string>
    <string>DejaVu Sans</string>
    <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
    <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
    <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>

Do we really need this one? we use DejaVu fonts by default
for now though, any reasons you prefer Bitstream Vera fonts
rather than DejaVu fonts?

if no strong opinion on it, we could get rid of it and
binding="strong" too.


Attachment: pgpiwNzcRDANF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

fonts mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux