Am Freitag, den 30.01.2009, 19:04 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: > Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 12:09 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : > > > > OK, changed this. FontForge also says the version is 1.0 should I use > > this or the release date like now? > > As the documentation says never use 1.0 unless your 100% sure the next > release will be named 1.1 and not 1.0 again > > > but rpmlint has 2 warning for me: > > > > yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation > > If there is really no upstream documentation there is not much you can > do (but look at how yanone-kaffeesatz is packaged anyway) > > > yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-yanone-tagesschrift.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/64-yanone-tagesschrift.conf > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#rpmlint_complains_of_absolute_symbolic_links.21 > > rpmlint output is to be taken with a grain of salt, especially warnings Hey, thank you for your fast answer! I created a Review request for my package. You find it here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 One thing I noticed when going through the Joining the Fonts SIG wikipage: There is written that you should apply for membership in the cvsextras group on fas. This group does (not longer) exist. One more question. I started looking at the next font - Vollkorn. http://www.grafikfritze.de/?p=43 On the website there is only the *.otf file. Should I put it into an archive for packaging? Thank you a lot! Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
