Re: Packaging questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 12:09 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit :
> OK, changed this. FontForge also says the version is 1.0 should I use
> this or the release date like now? 

As the documentation says never use 1.0 unless your 100% sure the next
release will be named 1.1 and not 1.0 again

> but rpmlint has 2 warning for me:
>         yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation

If there is really no upstream documentation there is not much you can
do (but look at how yanone-kaffeesatz is packaged anyway)

>         yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-yanone-tagesschrift.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/64-yanone-tagesschrift.conf        

rpmlint output is to be taken with a grain of salt, especially warnings

Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Fedora-fonts-list mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux