Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 12:09 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : > > OK, changed this. FontForge also says the version is 1.0 should I use > this or the release date like now? As the documentation says never use 1.0 unless your 100% sure the next release will be named 1.1 and not 1.0 again > but rpmlint has 2 warning for me: > > yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation If there is really no upstream documentation there is not much you can do (but look at how yanone-kaffeesatz is packaged anyway) > yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-yanone-tagesschrift.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/64-yanone-tagesschrift.conf http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#rpmlint_complains_of_absolute_symbolic_links.21 rpmlint output is to be taken with a grain of salt, especially warnings -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
_______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
