Hi, 2010/6/4 Parag N(पराग़) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Nicolas Spalinger > <nicolas_spalinger@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Paul Flo Williams wrote: >>> Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> I noticed Google has recently launched its google font directory. As part >>>> of this they have negotiated the opening up of various previous not >>>> completely open fonts. Here a list of fonts which we have not yet packaged, >>>> and which are not on the wishlist either: >>> >>> [snipped list] >>> >>> There seems to have been a flurry of packaging activity on these over the >>> past week. I am slightly concerned that some of them don't seem to be >>> following the naming guidelines for font packages. >>> >>> As an example, OFL Sorts Mill Goudy seems to have been rushed from first >>> packaging to release in just six days, but there is no foundry name, >>> although Google seems to be treated as upstream for this and several other >>> fonts. >>> >>> Are we going to start using "google" as a foundry name, or take the >>> original source of these, where possible? >>> >>> Paul >> >> >> I recommend going to the upstream website for various open fonts >> currently in the Google font directory, there are upstream URL links in >> the METADATA files. >> >> Also for packaging in Fedora you probably want the full version (with >> more extended sources) and not the web-optimized version in the root >> folder of the hg repository. >> >> The structure of the upstream hg repository is being reworked and >> reorganized with the goals to fix some metadata bugs and unneeded files >> who have slipped it and move closer to the recommended ). I recommend >> waiting a little bit for that to settle before doing packaging. >> >> Cheers >> >> >> -- >> Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer >> Debian/Ubuntu font teams / OpenFontLibrary >> http://planet.open-fonts.org >> > > > Thanks all for your replies. I am willing to fix those packages if > they are needed to be renamed. Please tell me or open new bugzilla and > I will rename them. I do have plan to package remaining fonts but I > think then I will wait for some more time then. > > Packages from above list which are now in fedora are > tangerine-fonts > lobster-fonts > josefinsansstd-light-fonts > crimson-text-fonts > molengo-fonts > ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts > cardo-fonts > > should foundry name for these be upstream website names? or > googlefontdirectory or just google? > > If it should be from upstream then I will choose following names (also > will pull latest fonts from website given as now googlefontdirectory > is changed within week) > > tomagiri-tangerine-fonts -> not found any url > typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts->http://typemade.mx > aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts ->http://aldusleaf.org/ > moyogo-molengo-fonts ->http://code.google.com/u/moyogo/ > crudfactory-ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts->http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/index.html > scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts-> http://scholarsfonts.net/cardofnt.html > > > Parag. > I have re-packaged all above to follow foundry in font package names and submitted to package review. Its since a week I am still looking for reviewers. I request if someone can spare some time from their busy work schedule and help to review them, I will be thankful to them. Parag. _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
