---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Qianqian Fang <fangqq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
To: Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
yes, I have the same question. The offending characters are the embedded bitmaps from Uming.
I am not sure. This used to happen when the local is non-CJK: the Japanese fonts has the highest priorities, and Uming/Ukai mixed to show the rest.
From: Qianqian Fang <fangqq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
To: Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
----- "AKanda" <welovebemani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The last update for VLgothics "vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch"
> is perhaps not good. (Install by yum.)
> Since this update, the "japanese-fonts" of my system (all my sytem :What is your locale (desktop language)?
> nautilus, openoffice, website ...) is not beautifull.
>
yes, I have the same question. The offending characters are the embedded bitmaps from Uming.
It looks like you are suffering from the Han unification issue Nicolas mentioned.
I am not sure. This used to happen when the local is non-CJK: the Japanese fonts has the highest priorities, and Uming/Ukai mixed to show the rest.
Jens
_______________________________________________
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
_______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
