Le 16/07/2010 11:09, Paul Flo Williams a écrit : > I imagine that Nicolas raised this problem while doing his periodic > fonts-incorrectly-packaged-in-non-font-package checks. The request to > separate out the fonts from poker3d-data has been long since closed > WONTFIX: Actually one of the main reasons for separating fonts in sub-packages (apart from user convenience) is to force package maintainers to investigate a little the licensing of the fonts they push in Fedora, and identify legal problems (sadly, I think the majority of the fonts identified this way had to be retired, either because of legal problems, or because they were old buggy versions of fonts we already shipped in other packages). If someone want to look at the wontfixes that resulted from the initial mass-bugzilla filling, I'm sure there are still problems lurking (I don't really have the time or energy to do so right now). Another way is just to point repo-font-audit (which is in fontpackages-tools) to a public rawhide repo, and it will generate an up-to-date report. BTW Thanks a lot for your current activity fonts-side Paul, it could not come at a better moment -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
