Re: abattis-cantarell-fonts looking for review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[...]

>>> I will clear some of this up at the weekend.
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Any progress about the updated source, Dave?
> 
> I got caught up with typecon.com and then burningman.com and I'm about
> to go to atypi.org but then ill be at fudcon zurich and so I expect to
> sort this there, if not sooner :)

Just a quick note to ping about upstream hosting for Cantarell now that
the font has also been pushed to its own repo on git.gnome.org:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/cantarell-fonts/

The font files themselves seem to be the same version than in the Google
font directory repo and in the upstream http://abattis.org/cantarell.
But there are discrepancies between chosen licensing and the
corresponding notices or metadata across the various font sources. Some
synchronisation would be very helpful for end-users, fellow designers
and maintainers.

IMHO this should be sorted quickly for such a prominent font project.
Following some of the general open font best practises is probably
useful for long-term maintainership as well (FONTLOG.txt, sources/,
line-endings, buildpath, etc).


Cheers,


-- 
Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer
Debian/Ubuntu font teams
http://planet.open-fonts.org

_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux