On 6 June 2011 21:25, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do agree with Behdad, problem must be fix from where it originates.
.conf rules must be process same way whether it is pango or qt.
for getting some breathing time i am presently fixing it in fonts with tweak.
Thanks,
Pravin S
On 06/06/11 11:03, Kevin Kofler wrote:Kevin, apparently you do not quite understand how fontconfig is supposed to be
> So please do not sabotage efforts to get a real-world bug fixed in a timely
> manner in the name of some theoretical ideal fix which will take months or
> years to develop.
used. ÂThat's fine. ÂQt is broken, been broken for years. ÂI'm not talking
about "theoretical ideal fix". ÂIt's plain wrong, a patch to fix it would be
prolly 20 lines. ÂNow if no one really cares about fixing it properly, why
bother? ÂHas the issue even been reported to Qt upstream?
I do agree with Behdad, problem must be fix from where it originates.
.conf rules must be process same way whether it is pango or qt.
for getting some breathing time i am presently fixing it in fonts with tweak.
Thanks,
Pravin S
_______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
