Le dimanche 21 décembre 2008 à 20:27 +0100, Marcin Garski a écrit : > Hi, Hi Marcin, > I'm trying to convert my packages (jomolhari-fonts, > tibetan-machine-uni-fonts) to new font packaging guidelines. Thank you for working on it! > I've encounter one problem that stops me from filling all guidelines. > I don't know the right font family (serif, sans serif, other?) for both > fonts, so I can't create a fontconf files. > > How can I find/known this font family (both fonts represents Tibetan > script which I don't know)? The current fontconfig classification is very latin-oriented, that's true. To decide on how the fonts should be best classified you need to ask the locals. Check on http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/ if there is a contact for those locales, and if not ask on the unicode mailing list where many language experts can help you http://unicode.org/mail-arch/ > BTW. If both fonts are installed TMU is selected as a primary font for > displaying Dzongkha text, is there a way to set fontconfig to prefer > Jomolhari when dealing with Dzongkha text and TMU when displaying > Tibetan text (Jomolhari is better for Dzongkha text and TMU for Tibetan > text). There are various ways to put one font first for specific locales. The current rather brutal way to do it is documented in /usr/share/doc/fontpackages-devel-*/fontconfig-templates/l10n-font-template.* It's not completely satisfactory, and Behdad is working on a new fontconfig release, so don't hesitate to ask him directly (he's often in the ##fonts irc channel as behdad) Sincerely, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
_______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
