Re: SIG status?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:18:06 +0100
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > 2) Would your SIG be so kind as to provide monthly status reports to
> > either FESCo or the 'devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' mailing list?
> > Think of this not as a bureaucratic measure being imposed on you,
> > but more as what I call a "force multiplier" - a way to bring to the
> > forefront of the larger Fedora community what your SIG is doing and
> > why they might want to get involved in it.
> I've tried in the past to post such reports on the devel list but have
> realized that they take too much work to be done monthly (I spent
> several weeks preparing them, which is not efficient given the low
> number of active contributors to the SIG).
> Therefore I've written an audit script (repo-font-audit in
> fontpackages-tools) that collects 80% of the info I used to collect
> manually, is more thorough, and can be run at any time by anyone to
> check the fonts status in Fedora.

I was not looking for a super detailed report on everything (Although
the font audit script is very cool. ;) I was more looking for something


> We need more people. Any help to recruit them is welcome :)

Yeah, agreed. 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

fonts mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux