On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le vendredi 30 juillet 2010 à 13:18 -0400, TK009 a écrit : >> I like the fonts and have packaged them for myself already. I didn't >> think they could be packaged do to conflicting licenses. If they can >> be packaged as is, I am all for that, I didn't believe they could be >> without creator intervention. Regarding the emails I sent, I am very >> far from a zealot so I included no freetardiness in them. I was very >> polite and respectful. > > I didn't say you were, it's just known GUST people tend to react badly > to anything that smells like GPL-ism :( > >> If they can be packaged as is I will gladly package them up. > > The Gyre fonts should be license-clean now (they got URW to relicense > the original URW donation under their preferred license last year, and > dropped the bits that were contributed under the GPL to the ghostscript > version) > > See for example the first block of : > http://www.gust.org.pl/projects/e-foundry/tex-gyre/adventor/qag-hist.txt/view > > For other GUST fonts, not part of the Gyre collection, you can ask me or > spot. IIRC they are not all released under the same licence and some of > them are OK, others not. > > Please package the OTF versions and do one package per font in TEX Gyre > (not one huge TEX Gyre srpm). > >> Let me >> know. If they can not, then imho they should be removed from the wish >> list. There is no reason to bow down to anyone and this creator has >> reached that line. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Mailhot > > > Will do, and will do =) _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
