Re: GUST fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
<nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 juillet 2010 à 13:18 -0400, TK009 a écrit :
>> I like the fonts and have packaged them for myself already. I didn't
>> think they could be packaged do to conflicting licenses. If they can
>> be packaged as is, I am all for that, I didn't believe they could be
>> without creator intervention. Regarding the emails I sent, I am very
>> far from a zealot so I included no freetardiness in them. I was very
>> polite and respectful.
> I didn't say you were, it's just known GUST people tend to react badly
> to anything that smells like GPL-ism :(
>> If they can be packaged as is I will gladly package them up.
> The Gyre fonts should be license-clean now (they got URW to relicense
> the original URW donation under their preferred license last year, and
> dropped the bits that were contributed under the GPL to the ghostscript
> version)
> See for example the first block of :
> For other GUST fonts, not part of the Gyre collection, you can ask me or
> spot. IIRC they are not all released under the same licence and some of
> them are OK, others not.
> Please package the OTF versions and do one package per font in TEX Gyre
> (not one huge TEX Gyre srpm).
>>  Let me
>> know. If they can not, then imho they should be removed from the wish
>> list. There is no reason to bow down to anyone and this creator has
>> reached that line.
> Regards,
> --
> Nicolas Mailhot

Will do, and will do =)
fonts mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux