On 11/09/2009 07:42 AM, Igshaan Mesias wrote: > Hi Everyone > > > I've packaged the M+ collection of fonts. I've not yet submitted a > review because I am unsure about what to label the 'License' tag in spec > file given its authors have simply put the license as follows: > > http://mplus-fonts.sourceforge.jp/mplus-outline-fonts/index-en.html#license > > "These fonts are free softwares. > Unlimited permission is granted to use, copy, and distribute it, with or > without modification, either commercially and noncommercially. > THESE FONTS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY." > > The following page notes the license as being "mplus", however, rpmlint > will not like this, so my question is, should I leave the 'License' tag > in the spec file as Mplus and let rpmlint moan, or do I change to > something it likes? if so what do I change it to? If the license table has it as a valid and acceptable license, you're fine. RPMlint probably needs to have its license list updated. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
