On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 01:23 -0800, Roozbeh Pournader a écrit : >> and everybody just calls ASCII? > > Everybody just calls ASCII iso-8859-1 or even plain text in any > encoding. ASCII is meaningless as soon as you put everybody in the > equation. You lost me there. Are you saying that people are usually careless about using character set names, or are you saying the term "ASCII" is ambiguous? > Note that the guidelines says SHOULD, not MUST so 100% compliance is not > expected (even though we've been slacking IMHO) Oh of course. But SHOULD means: "SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course." [RFC 2119] So, I need to understand the full implications before I choose not to do it ;-) > Well, sure, if you feel strongly about it just do it. I'll welcome > someone else working on enhancing our fonts packaging guidelines for > once :) OK, I will think about it and see what makes sense. I will probably need to write a script or two to investigate the fonts we have with the language coverage. > IMHO our fonts-related comps groups have become too big to be > user-friendly and effective, but this opinion does not seem to be shared > by a lot of people so I had pushed reworking our comps rules to some > other future release. That's another story now... Roozbeh _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
