IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Mary B
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Turn HotRFCs into Bumps at Virtual IETFs?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Meetecho IETF support
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Salz, Rich
• RE: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• RE: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Richard Barnes
• RE: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Carrick Bartle
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• RE: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Daniele Ceccarelli
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Kudos to MeetEcho
  • From: Chris Inacio
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: Meetecho abrupt termination of meeting
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Meetecho abrupt termination of meeting
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: tom petch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: lloyd . wood=40yahoo . co . uk
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Jay Daley
• Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) awards for IETF 108
  • From: Colin Perkins
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Joel Halpern Direct
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: John Levine
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RFC abbreviations list
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• NomCom office hours
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Mary B
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-08
  • From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-08
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-08
  • From: Joe Clarke via Datatracker
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: lloyd . wood=40yahoo . co . uk
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Potvin
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: lloyd . wood=40yahoo . co . uk
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: lloyd . wood=40yahoo . co . uk
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [Offlist] IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-suit-architecture-11.txt> (A Firmware Update Architecture for Internet of Things) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Jacob Uecker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-12
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Mary B
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Rob Evans
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [Offlist] IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-12
  • From: David Schinazi via Datatracker
• RE: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Ole Troan
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Mary B
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• RE: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Mary B
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• IAB report to the community for IETF-108
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: tom petch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Tools (was: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language)
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Carrick Bartle
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Tim Wicinski
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: [Last-Call] [Cellar] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-16
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: Michael StJohns
• IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  • From: The IESG
• IETF 108
  • From: IETF Chair
• ANRW'20 Call for Participation - Separate registration required & closes on Sunday July 26
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Deep Dive on the DNS - Tomorrow (Thursday, July 23, 2020 - 18:00-19:30 UTC)
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-108
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Salz, Rich
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-108
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: tom petch
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-16
  • From: Liang Xia via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-11
  • From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: IPv6-only and gather.town for meeting at IETF
  • From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-06
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-06
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-06
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• IESG pre-meeting report
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: IPv6-only and gather.town for meeting at IETF
  • From: Alexa Morris
• RE: IPv6-only and gather.town for meeting at IETF
  • From: Khaled Omar
• IPv6-only and gather.town for meeting at IETF
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: [xml2rfc] End of support for xml2rfc on Python 2.x is coming soon
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: End of support for xml2rfc on Python 2.x is coming soon
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Scheme Registration (was Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• IETF 108 Standard Registration Deadline Today!
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Ted Hardie
• NomCom 2020-2021: Composition of IETF Nomination Committee
  • From: NomCom Chair 2020
• Re: End of support for xml2rfc on Python 2.x is coming soon
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-108
  • From: Aaron Falk
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Martin Thomson
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Larry Masinter
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Larry Masinter
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-11
  • From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Scheme Registration (was Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme)
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22
  • From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: WHATWG [was: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme]
  • From: Rob Sayre
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22
  • From: Al Morton via Datatracker
• RE: WHATWG [was: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme]
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: WHATWG [was: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme]
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• WHATWG [was: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-06
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-06
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-06
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Tim Bray
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: [108attendees] Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-108
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: [108attendees] Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-108
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: [108attendees] Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-108
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Additional advisors
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-16
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: IEPG (Internet Engineering and Planning Group) meeting at IETF108 in [Error_Undefined]
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• IEPG (Internet Engineering and Planning Group) meeting at IETF108 in [Error_Undefined]
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: [Last-Call] [ippm] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-06
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Mary B
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Rob Sayre
• RE: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• RE: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Andrew Campling
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Additional advisors (was: RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process)
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• Re: Challenge from TE: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: 'Toerless Eckert'
• RE: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• Re: Challenge from TE: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Challenge from TE: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• Call for agenda items Gendispatch IETF108
  • From: Francesca Palombini
• Re: Challenge from TE: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Challenge from TE: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Challenge from TE: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-108
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• RE: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Mehmet Ersue
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Planned timetable for key decisions regarding IETF 109
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-16
  • From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-06
  • From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Mike StJohns
• Challenge: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Second Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: NomCom Chair 2020
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02
  • From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02
  • From: Leif Johansson via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Michael StJohns
• RE: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• RE: Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Tommy Pauly
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Michael StJohns
• IETF 108 Internet Draft Submission Cut-off Today!
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07
  • From: Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07
  • From: Peterson, Jon
• Re: On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• On diversity in the NomCom
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Eliot Lear
• [Last-Call] [OFF LIST] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Jose
• RE: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08
  • From: Ines Robles
• RE: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Floor Control for MeetEcho
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Mike StJohns
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
  • From: Brian Carpenter via Datatracker
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Theresa Enghardt
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Ali Mezgani
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Theresa Enghardt
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Ali Mezgani
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Theresa Enghardt
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Brian Carpenter
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Theresa Enghardt
• Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Joseph Touch
• IETF Slack workspace
  • From: Theresa Enghardt
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Mary B
• Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Michael StJohns
• RE: [108attendees] Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Andrew Campling
• Re: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04
  • From: slitkows.ietf
• Re: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Christian Hopps
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-06
  • From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
• Re: Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Paul Wouters
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04
  • From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Last-Call] [ippm] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08
  • From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-route-08
  • From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
• Re: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Virtual meeting scheduling
  • From: John C Klensin
• Fwd: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [Dots] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-23
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08
  • From: Ines Robles
• Re: Virtual meeting scheduling
  • From: tte@xxxxxxxxx
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-08
  • From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
• Re: Virtual meeting scheduling
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Virtual meeting scheduling
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: [nfsv4] Virtual meeting scheduling (wasL Re: Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-07-09)
  • From: Brian Pawlowski
• Re: [nfsv4] Virtual meeting scheduling (wasL Re: Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-07-09)
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [nfsv4] Virtual meeting scheduling (wasL Re: Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-07-09)
  • From: David Noveck
• Update on IETF 108 registration numbers
  • From: Jay Daley
• Fwd: [nfsv4] Fwd: (Forward to others) Webex meeting invitation: Pre-108 Virtual Interim
  • From: Brian Pawlowski
• Virtual meeting scheduling (wasL Re: Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-07-09)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09
  • From: Harlan Stenn
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08
  • From: Russ Housley
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08
  • From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
• Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
  • From: NomCom Chair 2020
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-13
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-12
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09
  • From: Karen O'Donoghue
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09
  • From: Vijay Gurbani
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-08
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Last-Call] [mpls] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-08
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09
  • From: Harlan Stenn
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09
  • From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi)