Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 23:34:42 +0000
In-reply-to: <ce51c2bd-5e59-6723-6204-d4eb70d86c93@lounge.org>
References: <60160A936BE682CEDE0704E1@PSB> <20200809053037.GV3100@localhost> <5c768c35-edb6-0180-737e-fa0c78cb971d@gmail.com> <20200809063805.GX3100@localhost> <005afe55-7c2c-a0a6-e66f-4513e006ab42@gmail.com> <20200809070448.GY3100@localhost> <20200809084341.GW40202@straasha.imrryr.org> <196BA5B1-92B6-4EC4-897E-F5C14E12647D@symbolic.software> <1783494857.1475756.1596964788830@mail.yahoo.com> <76FAC452-8C73-498E-920E-4A7E9D4A4E00@akamai.com> <20200809175214.GA3100@localhost> <58FA43EB-A679-46A1-87FB-2853FD85D388@akamai.com> <ce51c2bd-5e59-6723-6204-d4eb70d86c93@lounge.org>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.39.20071300

>       What is the criteria you have for deciding whether a word is 
    "exclusionary"?

We haven't even come to consensus that *anything* can be.  This question is premature.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Dan Harkins

References:
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Melinda Shore
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Melinda Shore
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Nadim Kobeissi
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Lloyd Wood
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Salz, Rich
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Salz, Rich
- Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
  - From: Dan Harkins

Prev by Date: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-suit-architecture-11
Next by Date: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Previous by thread: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Next by thread: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]