On 8/8/20 10:38 PM, Nico Williams wrote: > I'm asking for evidence that we have a problem. I'm quite aware that > there are RFCs that use various terms some/many consider offensive, but > I expect most of those are long in the past, and have to do with DNS. Well, if you actually look at the file that Fred provided, you'll find 34 8000-series RFCs (that series is obviously incomplete), 36 7000-series RFCs, 41 6000-series RFCs, 34 5000-series RFCs, 28 4000-series RFCs, 27 3000-series RFCs, 32 2000-series RFCs, 18 1000-series RFCs, 33 current working group drafts, and 42 individual drafts. "Master secret" is, of course, used quite heavily in TLS and TLS-related documents as one example of non-DNS use. I have no idea whether or not that constitutes a problem as you understand it because I don't know how you define "problem" in this context. At any rate, the data are there and in a format that can be easily searched, sorted, and summarized. Melinda -- Melinda Shore melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx Software longa, hardware brevis
