On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 03:39:33PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > We are not talking about board games here. Let’s stay focused and not > go to reduction ad absurdum arguments. We are talking about the > language used in IETF RFC’s. Viktor's explanation of how "master" in contexts w/o "slave" can't be offesnive needs to be addressed. Really, asserting that "master secret" is problematic is simply credibility-destroying.
