> On Aug 9, 2020, at 10:54 AM, Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Really, asserting that "master secret" > is problematic is simply credibility-destroying. Besides your concern, how does one secret actively control another? Or is it just that there is one root key from which others are derived? Ie why even bother defending a term that’s inaccurate to start? Joe
