Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe Touch wrote:

  Really, asserting that "master secret"
is problematic is simply credibility-destroying.

Besides your concern, how does one secret actively control another?

As most people in US do not mind to play TRPGs with dungeon/game
masters, who control the games, why do we have to bother?
Or is it just that there is one root key from which others are derived?

"master secret" is used by many RFCs as terminology of TLS.

							Masataka Ohta




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux