On 8/9/20 12:23 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > > >> On Aug 9, 2020, at 10:54 AM, Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Really, asserting that "master secret" >> is problematic is simply credibility-destroying. > > Besides your concern, how does one secret actively control another? You are insisting that the only possible meaning of "master" is to control some[one|thing] else. According to New Oxford American Dictionary Third edition, that's true when used it as a noun, but not when used as an adjective or a verb. > > Or is it just that there is one root key from which others are derived? > > Ie why even bother defending a term that’s inaccurate to start? > > Joe > -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
