FWIW, for flip-flops, leader/follower works too. > On Jul 27, 2020, at 5:35 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Joe > > I see how that properly describes the relative authority of the two components. > > I always prefer to use a h/w flip-flop to visualise the behaviour. > > I am fine with moving to a new name provided we captures the actual behaviour. > > Stewart > >> On 26 Jul 2020, at 22:49, Joseph Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 26, 2020, at 2:32 PM, Jay Daley <jay@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> A question I can’t resolve by Googling - has anyone attempted to create entirely new words to represent the concepts that master or slave have been used to represent? e.g. a word that means "authoritative source of data that has no dependency on another source" and has no other meaning? >> >> Why aren’t either primary or authoritative vs. copy/secondary/replica sufficient? >> >> Joe >
