On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:48 AM Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
While there has been a lot of progress since 107, it is clear from the first couple of sessions that there are still a many rough edges that are wasting a lot of WG time. We should take a serious look at whether it's worth investing more in refining this tool, or whether a more standard tool would be appropriate.It might look weird to request such a clarification on an IETF mailing list, but I am afraid we should first agree on the correct meaning of *standard* here.
I would start with something like >1m DAU. That would give us tools that are broadly used (thus likely to have fixed the sort of rough edges we see here), but still leave several options to choose from.
Simon
_\\|//_
( O-O )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o00~~(_)~~00o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Simon Pietro Romano
Universita' di Napoli Federico II
Computer Engineering Department
Phone: +39 081 7683823 -- Fax: +39 081 7683816
e-mail: spromano@xxxxxxxx
<<Molti mi dicono che lo scoraggiamento è l'alibi degli
idioti. Ci rifletto un istante; e mi scoraggio>>. Magritte.
oooO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~( )~~~ Oooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\ ( ( )
\_) ) /
(_/
