Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Sunday, July 26, 2020 18:22 -0400 "Joel M. Halpern"
<jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I was carefully not talking about discussion among nomcom
> participants.
> As far as I can tell, nomcom chairs, nomcom members, and the
> community have a wide range of views on the degree to which
> liaisons should participate in such discussion.
> 
> While I tend towards your description below, I wanted to
> separate the voting, and make clear that the voting rules do
> matter.

Well, I'm glad I spoke up, because we actually may disagree.  In
an environment where there are only 10 nominal Nomcom members
who vote on candidates and the intent is to do things by
consensus rather than by, e.g., narrow majorities, the influence
of someone recognized, by virtue of being appointed as a liaison
by a relevant leadership body, as being more knowledgeable than
the typical Nomcom member and who then strongly supports or
argues for rejection of particular candidates is likely to be
important all out of proportion than the effect of an extra vote
or two.

And...


--On Monday, July 27, 2020 10:38 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The aspect that's tricky is if a liaison or advisor wishes to
> exercise their right (duty?) as an IETF community member to
> give feedback on the published nominees. Are they allowed to
> do so, and if so, should it be completely anonymised?

For the reasons above, I think either it has to be completely
anonymized (sic) or, just as someone who volunteers as a voting
member gives up the opportunity to be selected for a
Nomcom-appointed position, someone who volunteers to be a
liaison should be treated as having given their rights to make
comments on individual candidates.

Back when we anticipated 10 voting members and a couple of
liaisons (see RFC 2027 which, incidentally, clearly puts
"non-voting" with "liaison") and also anticipated that voting
Nomcom members would be sufficiently familiar with how the IETF
works and the people who were, or might be candidates for,
leadership positions, to not depend significantly on
questionnaires and external advice, none of this made a much
difference.  Now, however...

   best,
    john



   john






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux