On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:35:45AM -0700, The IESG wrote: > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-knodel-terminology/ I'm surprised not to find there anything like a survey of RFCs, current I-Ds, and maybe even expired I-Ds, of problematic language. Or any analysis of the prevalence of problematic language and trends in its use. Did we use to have a problem that we now no longer have? Do we still have a problem? Is it getting better or worse? Can we ask the author, and/or maybe the RPC, to perform such a survey? (The RPC presumably would only survey RFCs, not I-Ds.) It would be quite useful to have such a survey. Nico --
