Re: Appeal and IANA correspondence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Timothy Mcsweeney wrote on 29/07/2020 15:04:
> I mean, it just does not get any clearer than that!  

Luckily it gets much clearer!  The ABNF syntax is specified in section 3:

>    The generic URI syntax consists of a hierarchical sequence of
>    components referred to as the scheme, authority, path, query, and
>    fragment.
> 
>       URI         = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

Where "scheme" is defined in section 3.1 as:

> scheme      = ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )

I.e. the scheme name is followed by ":".

The ABNF syntax is completely unambiguous on this point and there's no
scope to argue that the scheme name should be followed by a "#" token.

Did you try resubmitting the I-D with "drop:" instead of "drop#"?

Nick




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux