text version: Hi Nick, >Did you try submitting a application which complied with the syntax >specified in rfc3986? I did! My spec references section 2.2 of RFC3986. Here is the first sentence from the third paragraph " A subset of the reserved characters (gen-delims) is used as delimiters of the generic URI components described in Section 3. " I mean, it just does not get any clearer than that! > On 07/29/2020 10:04 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Nick, > > >Did you try submitting a application which complied with the syntax > >specified in rfc3986? > > I did! > My spec references section 2.2 of RFC3986. Here is the first sentence from the third paragraph " > > A subset of the reserved characters (gen-delims) is used as > delimiters of the generic URI components described in Section 3 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3). > > " > > I mean, it just does not get any clearer than that! > > > > > > On July 29, 2020 at 7:41 AM Nick Hilliard < nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Timothy Mcsweeney wrote on 28/07/2020 22:55: > > > Murray, you're confused. I was speaking of the fact that when I asked > > > you how many people were involved in the decision you would not tell > > > me. Then Alissa says the whole IESG discussed your appeal. You could > > > have easily told me the same thing but didn't. > > Tim, > > > > Did you try submitting a application which complied with the syntax > > specified in rfc3986? > > > > Would this not be a productive way forward? > > > > Nick
