Which ”standard” tool would allow us having totally customized features like e.g. humming or queueing?...or sometimes even the button colored green rather than purple?
Personally I use “standard” tools every day and I don’t feel this any worse than any of them.
This is the first all virtual meeting and like any other product in release 1 there are bugs to fix.
BR
Daniele
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Richard Barnes
Sent: den 27 juli 2020 16:15
To: Chris Inacio <inacio@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Kudos to MeetEcho
While there has been a lot of progress since 107, it is clear from the first couple of sessions that there are still a many rough edges that are wasting a lot of WG time. We should take a serious look at whether it's worth investing more in refining this tool, or whether a more standard tool would be appropriate.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:08 AM Chris Inacio <inacio@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just want to say that I finished chairing a WG this morning and to say kudos to MeetEcho. Since it seems all I do is spend time in (many different) video conferencing apps, I think the updates to MeetEcho for the full virtual meeting are VERY impressive in the time from “Vancouver” till now.
It went smoother than I would have thought. I think MeetEcho did an amazing job. Thanks to them and all the leadership making the tooling work for this meeting.
There is the human problem of people reading the Jabber chat continuously during the meeting, because it really is now multiple stream communications during the meeting. If I knew the human / UI fix to that, I would suggest it, I don’t. I chair a small working group, so we can multitask that way. Large working groups will like have to the use the queue more formally than we did - with the chairs possibly voicing the jabber room.
