> On Jul 27, 2020, at 10:15 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@xxxxxx> wrote: > > While there has been a lot of progress since 107, it is clear from the first couple of sessions that there are still a many rough edges that are wasting a lot of WG time. We should take a serious look at whether it's worth investing more in refining this tool, or whether a more standard tool would be appropriate. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:08 AM Chris Inacio <inacio@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I just want to say that I finished chairing a WG this morning and to say kudos to MeetEcho. Since it seems all I do is spend time in (many different) video conferencing apps, I think the updates to MeetEcho for the full virtual meeting are VERY impressive in the time from “Vancouver” till now. > > It went smoother than I would have thought. I think MeetEcho did an amazing job. Thanks to them and all the leadership making the tooling work for this meeting. > > There is the human problem of people reading the Jabber chat continuously during the meeting, because it really is now multiple stream communications during the meeting. If I knew the human / UI fix to that, I would suggest it, I don’t. I chair a small working group, so we can multitask that way. Large working groups will like have to the use the queue more formally than we did - with the chairs possibly voicing the jabber room. > I disagree, there are often rough edges around the first time you use any tool, some of this is PBCAK and some is UI, etc. I have some suggestions to improve it, but the reality is this is a huge improvement and seems to be working well. - Jared Ps: suggestions follow - remember that I did data tracker login - show time remaining in meeting (countdown) - if I’ve scrolled to bottom of chat, and more people type, keep scrolling down so I don’t need to scroll further down
