For what it is worth...
Last year, I was the IESG liaison to NomCom and indeed I provided feedback with the tool (like mostly everyone) on some nominees (being already IESG members or potential new ones). Providing feedback is a "moral duty" for each community members IMHO. My feedback was not anonymous as I stand by my feedback and I also prefer to provide enough information to NomCom voting members to remove any potential bias of mine.
-éric
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Joel Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, 27 July 2020 at 01:03
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "'ietf@xxxxxxxx'" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion
The policy on most nomcoms on which I have information is that liaison
feedback on nominees and such should go via the tool. Whether it was
anonymized or not was up to the liaison.
Yours,
Joel
On 7/26/2020 6:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Strongly agree with Joel and John.
>
> The aspect that's tricky is if a liaison or advisor wishes to exercise
> their right (duty?) as an IETF community member to give feedback on the
> published nominees. Are they allowed to do so, and if so, should it be
> completely anonymised?
>
> Regards
> Brian
>
