I was reading through this thread over the last couple days and really didn't want to participate but after today's appeal decision I thought it would be best to fill in some of the holes for the community's benefit FWIW. So as soon as I gather up copies of all the email correspondence I will post them here with a couple other thoughts.
On July 28, 2020 at 9:24 AM Mark Nottingham < mnot@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's a longstanding problem in the e-mail system; e.g., look at the CSS in the QUIC weekly github digests.
On 28 Jul 2020, at 11:12 pm, IETF Chair < chair@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, it seems that an extra period gets added to the URL when embedded here in email. The response is linked from https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/appeals/ (and hopefully that link will work for everyone).
Alissa
On Jul 28, 2020, at 8:58 AM, IETF Chair < chair@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Apologies, I mis-copied the link. The correct link for the response is: https://www6.ietf.org/iesg/appeal/response-to-mcsweeney-2020-07-08.pdf
Alissa
On Jul 28, 2020, at 8:53 AM, IETF Chair < chair@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Tim,
The IESG’s response to your appeal is available at < " rel="noopener" target="_blank" data-mce-href="">https://www6.ietf.org/iesg/appeal/response-to-mcsweeney-2020-07-08.pdf>.
Alissa Cooper, IETF ChairFor the IESG
On Jul 16, 2020, at 12:00 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy < superuser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IESG has received an appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme and his related registration requests to IANA. The appeal has been posted on the appeals page:
Additional information has been requested from both Tim and IANA. Once those details have been received, the IESG will proceed to evaluate the appeal and render a decision.
Barry and Murray, ART Area DirectorsFor the IESG--Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
