Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have no idea where one might find international experts on technical
language, if such people even exist.

We could ask the OED people if they can point us such experts. It is possible that some of the to University English departments could point us in the right direction.

Dictionaries are descriptive; they describe language as people use it and what the words mean in current usage.

We're talking about prescriptive rules. I don't think our problem is that we don't understand what "slave" means.

We can and should consult with the editors of the other major SDOs.

I suppose but I can't ever recall a time when we believed that the way that the IEEE or W3C or ANSI or ITU wrote their documents was the way we should write our documents. (If we're going down that path, we can ditch our tools in favor of MS Word.)

This is a problem that the IETF really needs to solve itself.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxxx, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux