Re: Follow-up from NomCom advisor discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >> > Clearly we aren't talking about trivia like setting meeting times or
    >> > deciding whether to use Zoom or Whereby. So what are we talking about?
    >>
    >> Actually, I think it is about trivia like setting meeting times.
    >> There really aren't much that the group as a whole needs to vote on.
    >> But, as Joel said above: it is important that meeting times are when everyone
    >> can attend.

    > Seriously? A formal vote on meeting times? A doodle poll, sure. But not a
    > formal vote.

So, let me explain my experience a different way.
If we can get to consensus without a formal vote, then we don't need a vote.

Fundamentally, the advisors get to vote on the meeting times, so their
input matters to forming the consensus.  Otherwise, we don't need to consult them.

I don't think any nomcom I was involved with *formally* voted on meeting times.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux