Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Joseph Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

IMO, it would be useful for those who care to post a list of what they consider eligible and/or comment on lists others have posted.

Same with process.

So far we’ve been speaking in hypotheticals of what might result; I’d like to see what people have in mind beyond what’s written.

Joe

On Jul 27, 2020, at 9:16 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

• I’m asking what actions are planned. Or has that been sidelined in favor of discussion?

 

The IESG posted their statement four days ago. Since then about 200 messages with this subject have been posted, about 60 people commented and the top five are:

  29  "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>

  21  Masataka Ohta <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

  19  Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx>

  18  Joseph Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

   9  Dan Harkins dharkins@xxxxxxxxxx

 

More than half of all postings were people who posted one or two messages.

 

TL;DR:  Still early to plan actions I think.