> - Section 3: “A MOP value of 7 and above”. If the MOP is a 3-bit field, the
> highest MOP value is 7 (assuming that the lowest value is 0). Why state here
> "and above"? Are there plans to extend the MOP field size?
Yes, there is. See
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-mopex-01. This is why. Yet what you are saying makes sense, as written it cannot go beyond 7. I can change to "(and above when extended)"
> - Section 3, after “A MOP value of 7 and above”. s/MUST use
> compression/indicates that compression MUST be used
The following text
"
Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP)
in the DIO Base Object. For MOP values 0 to 6, the use of compression is
as specified in this document. A MOP value of 7 MUST use compression by
default and ignore the setting of the “T” flag.
"
was suggested by Alvaro during his A-D review. But I believe that your proposal does not alter the meaning so I'm picking it.
Resulting sentence:
"
Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP) in
the DIO Base Object. This specification applies to MOP values 0 to
6. For a MOP value of 7 (and above when extended), the compression
MUST be used by default regardless of the setting of the "T" flag."
> - Section 4, 1st paragraph: “if and only if the "T" flag is set.” Should we
> perhaps append “or if the MOP value is 7.” ?
With the change above, I believe that we are good.
