IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks-05
  • From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
• IMAP/IETF down?
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Nico Williams
• Comments on draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful-00
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Paul Wouters
• draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Eric Gray
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: John C Klensin
• privacy and IETF meetings in US
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Tsv-art] [tram] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Joe Touch
• RE: [Tsv-art] [tram] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
• Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-24
  • From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
• Re: [Teas] Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Curdle] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-07
  • From: Daniel Migault
• Re: [Tsv-art] [tram] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Joe Touch
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-08
  • From: Michael Tüxen via Datatracker
• RE: [tram] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
• RE: [tram] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
• Re: [tram] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Vijay Gurbani
• Re: [Curdle] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-07
  • From: Loganaden Velvindron
• Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [Curdle] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-07
  • From: Daniel Migault
• Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25
  • From: Colin Perkins
• RE: [tram] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
• Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-07
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Joseph Touch via Datatracker
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20
  • From: Christian Huitema via Datatracker
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-08
  • From: Pete Resnick via Datatracker
• Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-19
  • From: Brian Trammell via Datatracker
• Re: [tram] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Vijay Gurbani
• Re: Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
  • From: Martin J. Dürst
• RE: [tram] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-06
  • From: Stefan Santesson
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Adam Roach
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-08
  • From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
• ANRP award presentations at IETF 105
  • From: Colin Perkins
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
  • From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netvc-testing-08
  • From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
• RE: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-11
  • From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-22
  • From: Joe Touch
• RE: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-11
  • From: Rahul Arvind Jadhav
• Who is the editor? (was: Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Heather Flanagan
• Re:Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-22
  • From: 杨术
• The technological origins of the current trade war
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure via Datatracker
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Sean Turner
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25
  • From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-11
  • From: Shwetha Bhandari via Datatracker
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Nomcom 2019-2020 Call For Volunteers
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Nomcom 2019-2020 Call For Volunteers
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-06
  • From: Tim Hollebeek
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-06
  • From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
• Re: Nomcom 2019-2020 Call For Volunteers
  • From: Michael StJohns
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• IETF 105 Early Bird Dealine Approaching: Monday, June 3, 2019
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• RE: [Idr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-14
  • From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: John Levine
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Lloyd Wood
• 答复: [Teas] Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept)
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-06
  • From: Stefan Santesson via Datatracker
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions-12
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Gen-art] [tsvwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32-01
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-10
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-09
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: [Teas] Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
• Re: [Teas] Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-09
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: [Teas] Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tarek Saad
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07
  • From: Stephen Farrell via Datatracker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netvc-requirements-09
  • From: Filippov Alexey
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ietf meeting fees
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-05
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• ietf meeting fees
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-caa-06
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-06
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netvc-requirements-09
  • From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-34
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-09
  • From: Sean Turner via Datatracker
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Erik Kline via Datatracker
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• BCP 83 PR-Action Approved: Pradeep Kumar Xplorer
  • From: Adam Roach
• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-05
  • From: Adam Montville via Datatracker
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-netvc-requirements-09
  • From: Filippov Alexey
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: S. Moonesamy
• Remote participant fees (was : Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: John C Klensin
• On IETF hubs
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Iyedi Goma
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Loganaden Velvindron
• Re: [calsify] Last Call: <draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions-12.txt> (Event Publishing Extensions to iCalendar) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michael Douglass
• Re: [Eligibility-discuss] AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: John Levine
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Int-area] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-04
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: John Levine
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: John C Klensin
• Reminder: BOF proposals due in 2 weeks
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-netvc-requirements-09
  • From: Bernard Aboba via Datatracker
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20
  • From: Xufeng Liu
• Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
• BCP 83 PR-Action Approved: Pradeep Kumar Xplorer
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: tom petch
• Re: New Version of the Tao of the IETF
  • From: Niels ten Oever
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-04
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-14
  • From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: tom petch
• Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-06
  • From: Qin Wu via Datatracker
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 105 - Registration, Reservations, Social Event and more!
  • From: Jasmine Magallanes
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 105 - Registration, Reservations, Social Event and more!
  • From: Jasmine Magallanes
• Re: New Version of the Tao of the IETF
  • From: Job Snijders
• New Version of the Tao of the IETF
  • From: Niels ten Oever
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 105 - Registration, Reservations, Social Event and more!
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 105 - Registration, Reservations, Social Event and more!
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 105 - Registration, Reservations, Social Event and more!
  • From: Jasmine Magallanes
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 105 - Registration, Reservations, Social Event and more!
  • From: Darshak Thakore
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Paul Wouters
• RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-05
  • From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: David Noveck
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org
  • From: Roman Danyliw
• Re: [Ext] Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Michelle Cotton
• Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-15
  • From: Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Henry S. Thompson
• Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07
  • From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-23
  • From: Al Morton via Datatracker
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-14
  • From: Roni Even via Datatracker
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-23
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: David Noveck
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-23
  • From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
• Re: [manet] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-06
  • From: Bob Briscoe
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [IETF LLC] Venue Review Committee
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: [dnssd] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-19
  • From: Tom Pusateri
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [IETF LLC] Venue Review Committee
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25
  • From: Ines Robles
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25
  • From: Ines Robles
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25
  • From: Ines Robles
• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-19
  • From: Liang Xia via Datatracker
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-09
  • From: Allison Mankin via Datatracker
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-09
  • From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch virtually, IETF attendance costs
  • From: John Levine
• Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: email-101 [was Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs]
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: email-101 [was Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs]
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Eliot Lear (elear)
• virtual-only wgs?
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: [Perc] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [tsvwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32-01
  • From: Vincent Roca
• Re: [Perc] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• RE: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18
  • From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
• Re: [Perc] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: John Levine
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Mary B
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Greg Skinner
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Teas] Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tarek Saad
• email-101 [was Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-04
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Aaron Falk
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09
  • From: Igor Bryskin
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-09
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Perc] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-perc-double-10
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: David Noveck
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-06
  • From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
• Intdir early review of draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-10
  • From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: John C Klensin
• Finding the BOF [was Re: IETF attendance costs]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09
  • From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: to pitch or not to pitch, IETF attendance costs
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Mary B
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Mary B
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20
  • From: Melinda Shore via Datatracker
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-12
  • From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef via Datatracker
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: [Pce] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-13
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• RE: [Pce] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10
  • From: daniel
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-23
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13
  • From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-10.txt> (A YANG data model for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Xufeng Liu
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: David Noveck
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Ecn-sane] [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Reducing IETF scope in response to market forces
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: Reducing IETF scope in response to market forces
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: Reducing IETF scope in response to market forces
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [rfc-i] Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: David Noveck
• Re: Reducing IETF scope in response to market forces
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Reducing IETF scope in response to market forces
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Reducing IETF scope in response to market forces
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful - relying on early implementation
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful - relying on early implementation
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful - relying on early implementation
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful - relying on early implementation
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [calsify] Last Call: <draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions-12.txt> (Event Publishing Extensions to iCalendar) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Дилян Палаузов
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: jCal obsoletes iCalendar? (was Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful)
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Evolving document sources over a long time (Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Nico Williams
• Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: David Noveck
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF attendance costs
  • From: Paul Wouters
• IETF attendance costs
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Another mail bomber
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Exploring Synergy between Content Aggregation and the Publisher Ecosystem
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Another mail bomber
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Another mail bomber
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Another mail bomber
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Mary B
• Re: Another mail bomber
  • From: Glen
• Re: Another mail bomber
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Another mail bomber
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Tom Herbert
• BOF proposals due in 4 weeks
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-03
  • From: Adrian Farrel via Datatracker
• Re: travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
  • From: Dave Taht
• RE: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle - considered harmful
  • From: Keith Moore
• Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-03
  • From: Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Authorship (Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Authorship (Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-10.txt> (A YANG data model for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: tom petch
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-10.txt> (A YANG data model for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Xufeng Liu
• RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Bob Briscoe
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Lloyd Wood
• Comments on draft-roach-bis-documents-00
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joe Touch
• Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-35
  • From: Zitao Wang via Datatracker
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Adam Roach
• RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: John Levine
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Bless, Roland (TM)
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: John C Klensin
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32-01
  • From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Secdir Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types
  • From: Valery Smyslov
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: [Dots] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-31
  • From: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [arch-d] [IAB] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-04
  • From: David Black via Datatracker
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: [arch-d] [IAB] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: [IAB] [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [IAB] [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
  • From: Barry Leiba