Hi Alissa,
At 10:56 AM 26-06-2019, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
> Section 7.1.1 of the draft specifies that a recall petition as a
"Community Petition". However, it does not provide any rationale
for restricting signatories to "members of the IETF community" who
can afford to attend IETF meetings. Why are there two classes of
members in the IETF?
>
> The above-mentioned restriction is contrary to one of the goals
of the Internet Standards Process, which is fairness. Unfairness
is not be usually considered as a "Best Common Practice" and yet
this draft intends to "standardize" it. It would be quite
unfortunate if the members of the IESG condoned the procedure
specified in Section 7.1.1.
In response to the Gen-ART review and follow-on discussion, the
following sentence has been added to the -08 version of the document:
"This revision addresses only the changes required for IASA 2.0;
should the community agree on other changes, they will be addressed
in future documents."
If I am not mistaken, the process for this Last Call is based on BCP
9. The proposed sentence unfortunately does not address the comments
which I sent on the Last Call.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
