Hello,
At 12:46 PM 07-06-2019, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the IETF Administrative Support Activity
2 WG (iasa2) to consider the following document: - 'IAB, IESG, IETF Trust and
IETF LLC Selection, Confirmation, and Recall
Process: Operation of the IETF Nominating and Recall Committees'
<draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis-07.txt> as Best Current Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-06-21. Exceptionally, comments may be
There wasn't any proclamation (Section 4.4) during the last plenary
session [1]. Did the IASA 2.0 Working Group discuss that?
Section 7.1.1 of the draft specifies that a recall petition as a
"Community Petition". However, it does not provide any rationale for
restricting signatories to "members of the IETF community" who can
afford to attend IETF meetings. Why are there two classes of members
in the IETF?
The above-mentioned restriction is contrary to one of the goals of
the Internet Standards Process, which is fairness. Unfairness is not
be usually considered as a "Best Common Practice" and yet this draft
intends to "standardize" it. It would be quite unfortunate if the
members of the IESG condoned the procedure specified in Section 7.1.1.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/minutes-104-ietf-201903271710-00
