RE: Effective discourse in the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy,

 

I essentially agree, with the qualification that - if you don't "posit a wrong answer" that wouldn't pass the least discerning sanity filter - you could find yourself "filtered out" of all subsequent discussion.

 

If I feel sure that I am wrong, I would think about the question further before adding to the inevitable noise.

 

I have hopes that this is a common point of view, in spite of evidence that occasionally arise to the contrary.

 

😊

--

Eric

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Friday, July 5, 2019 1:34 PM
To: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Effective discourse in the IETF

 

> If you think youʼre definitely wrong about something, and the goal of

> a discussion is to find a right answer, why would you contribute that

> something to a discussion?

 

on some mailing lists, e.g. nanog, a good way to get an answer to a question is to posit a wrong answer.  if you just ask the question, no one will answer; but 412 people are happy to correct you. :)

 

of course it requires a thick skin and the ability to sort through 412 responses.

 

randy

 


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux