On 6/26/19 4:28 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:13:46PM -0500, Adam Roach wrote:
Sarah explained the contract question already:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IdUciHW3pdluk1m2pYaqk9JCj4c
I have nothing to add to her explanation, as there's really no more
substantive detail regarding the contract than what she already included.
To your second query: I will point out that planning takes time, and no one
wanted to rush the process.
That doesn't seem to be a terribly substative answer to the question,
why the decision had to be made in 2019, whether to put the contract
back out to bid in 2021, versus 2023?
Could you perhaps add more substance to enlighten that particular
aspect of this issue?
Sarah has again beaten me to it:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rsfsZmG4yRkUv_sUUaGXGPxzNE4
/a
