Hi Leif,
At 11:30 PM 26-06-2019, Leif Johansson wrote:
Personally I think accountability has value.
Yes.
There was dilution of responsibility. The end-result is a RFC Series
Editor role which is answerable to at least three structures. It
will probably be worse with the IASA 2.0.
The Internet Architecture Board claimed to have oversight over the
RFC Editor function. That claim is based on what was chiseled in
obsoleted RFCs. The Internet Architecture Board previously stated
that it has a role as a shepherd of the RFC series. A shepherd which
follows process at the expense of evaluating the probability of a
negative outcome does not fully understand what he/she is accountable for.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
