On 09-Jul-19 04:52, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Scott Mansfield <scott.mansfield@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > First off: Need two terms clearly defined: > > > Voting Volunteers > > Non-Voting Volunteers > > These were always poor words. > > On non-selecting votes (such as when to have a meeting, whether to approve a > questionnaire, approving voting proceedures, whether to adjourne a meeting, > etc), all committee members have usually voted. It rather shocks me that you include "whether to approve a questionnaire, approving voting proceedures" here. It seems to me that for those decisions, the liaisons should sit back. (They would certainly provide input to the questionnaires, of course.) Brian (once a liaison to NomCom, many years ago) > Better words would be: > > selecting volunteers > non-selecting volunteers > > [nomcom chair 2014/2015] > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > >
