[On Personal title, and changing the subject because this answers a specific question]
[snip]
>
> The related statement in RFC 6635 is slightly different, as it says:
>
> The IAB is responsible for the oversight of the RFC Series and acts
> as a body for final conflict resolution, including the process
> described in Section 4.3 <<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6635#section-4.3>>.
True, but that isn't a BCP with IETF consensus, is it?
No it isn't. My understanding of the reasoning behind that choice, though, was that it matched the new model better to have the model documents published in the IAB stream. Leslie and Olaf may have better clue than me, though.
Indeed. Paraphrasing my recollection: the motivations was the idea that on the topic of the RFC model, the IETF community was a subset of the interested parties and publication on the IAB stream would signal a disinterested broker.
—Olaf
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
