Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As a consultant, my primary affiliation is my consulting company. Yet
> there seems to be a feeling that I should disclose (at least to the
> NomCom chair) a list of my company's major customers, where "major"
> means more than x% of the company's income stream.
I went down this path this time as well.
I decided to disclose 20% relationship nomcom chair.
> I think that I agree with Stewart that the ambiguity in the definition
> makes for interpretation issues such that if my company had major
> dealings with Foo Corp and the selection process identified me and two
> employees of Foo Corp it would not be clear whether we should all serve
> or not.
> (I have a personal opinion about this, but that is not the point. The
> point is that there is no obvious guidance in the RFC.)
I don't think we can write any hard and fast rules.
I think that we shouldn't try.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
