Hi Joerg, I just want to respond to two of your comments. I will let the authors chime in on the other comments. > On Jul 4, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Joerg Ott <ott@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > I am sorry but this is not acceptable. You are asking other people > to read the document and comment on it. As such, we may certainly > expect that what we get to review in last call is ready for RFC. > This document clearly is not. Are their specific parts of the document that you are concerned about here on the clarity front? I have read the document and have not had any clarity issues (but that might be because I have been reading this for too long). > ... >> Detailed comments: >> In several places, the text reminds of patent jargon. Should I >> worry? There doesn't appear >> to be any IPR disclosure. > > Here, I'd really like to get an explicit response. The authors have confirmed that they have filed any necessary IPR disclosures as per BCP78/79 as documented in the shepherd writeup. Thanks Suresh
