Hi Suresh, Jorg
Thank you for answering the two comments. I would not have said better!
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:26 PM Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Joerg,
I just want to respond to two of your comments. I will let the authors chime in on the other comments.
> On Jul 4, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Joerg Ott <ott@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> I am sorry but this is not acceptable. You are asking other people
> to read the document and comment on it. As such, we may certainly
> expect that what we get to review in last call is ready for RFC.
> This document clearly is not.
Are their specific parts of the document that you are concerned about here on the clarity front? I have read the document and have not had any clarity issues (but that might be because I have been reading this for too long).
> ...
>> Detailed comments:
>> In several places, the text reminds of patent jargon. Should I
>> worry? There doesn't appear
>> to be any IPR disclosure.
>
> Here, I'd really like to get an explicit response.
The authors have confirmed that they have filed any necessary IPR disclosures as per BCP78/79 as documented in the shepherd writeup.
Thanks
Suresh
Best Regards
Nabil Benamar
Associate Professor
Department of Computer Sciences
School of Technology
Moulay Ismail University
Meknes. Morocco
