Re: Things that used to be clear (was Re: Evolving Documents (nee "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 03:10:34PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Actually we are pretty good about getting early reviews from, for instance,
> sec-dir.  Chairs ask, and they happen, and I think that this has been good.
> We also get food feedback from IANA, and we can get it early as well.

I didn't know IANA could be asked to review early...

I know we sometimes do early reviews in sec-dir, but not necessarily
often enough?

> The problem is getting the majority of the IESG to put credence in these
> reviews is part where I think we lose time.

Interesting.  Well, maybe that should change.  How much de-novo review
does IESG do?  Do most ADs fully read and review every I-D that comes
up, or do they mostly rely on the review record from the shepherd and
directorates?

Nico
-- 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux