Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The only way you'll get currently-late reviews to happen earlier is to
> provide a mechanism for that. That could be as simple as having a WG
> chair request an interim review from an appropriate directorate.
> Of course, we may not have the directorate cycles for interim reviews,
> in which case we might need to improve the directorates.
Actually we are pretty good about getting early reviews from, for instance,
sec-dir. Chairs ask, and they happen, and I think that this has been good.
We also get food feedback from IANA, and we can get it early as well.
The problem is getting the majority of the IESG to put credence in these
reviews is part where I think we lose time.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
