On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:39 PM Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm happy to include IRTF and ISE; their omission was a simple
> oversight. But even if we expand my statment to say "The primary way
> the RFC editor adds value is by publishing IAB/IETF/IRTF/ISE
> documents", then wouldn't the natural course be, for example, for the
> owners of those streams to collectively oversee the RFC editor?
as those august bodies oversaw postel, braden, ... oh wait.
Postel was dead before I entered university, so I missed that era, and might be misunderstanding what you mean. But just so I'm clear, you think we should pay someone to be RSE, and have nobody reviewing their work?
--Richard
