> 1. Thanks to Scott and Victor for being conscientious here. It's clear y'all are trying to do the right thing. +1000 for this And they are also volunteers who burn a lot of their own time on this. Thank you! As for the rest, I’m certainly happy with any outcome. At first I wondered why the result was what it was, then as Victor explained the rationale, it made sense, and now we have some discussion of what the spec actually says. We will figure that out, I’m sure. (But, if we need a change in the spec for some reason, I did want to say that there’s probably some things to consider, and that thinking will take time. So whatever we do for this Nomcom is perhaps something that shouldn’t be considered as a binding precedent, but rather the solution for this nomcom, lets take the time to process the long term answer fully, rather than try to have that answer before this nomcom gets seated. The need to start work soon…) Jari
